| 1 |
Veer Bahadur Gurjar (10678) |
Rs.5000/- Deposited by RERA Trans. No 1954 Dated 20.05.2024 FOR MODIFICATION OF PROJECT DETAILS. |
5/21/2024 |
PENDING WITH NODAL OFFICER |
|
| 2 |
Puneet Kapoor (10671) |
1.)Instead of getting sign and seal of signatory on behalf of firm,get the sign and seal of Respective/Concerned engineer on Service drawings.
Also Presently the sign and seal of signatory on behalf of firm is pasted/scanned copy,get the sign and seal of Respective/Concerned engineer on Service drawings.
2.)In tab of “Rain Water Harvesting/ Recharging” upload the as titled Rain Water Harvesting/ Recharging detail drawing.
Comply with the same by on or before 02.06.2024
|
5/27/2024 |
APPLICATION OBJECTED |
|
| 3 |
Promoter |
Dear Sir,
As per the observation raised in the online application by you,
1.) The services drawings are uploaded duly signed and sealed by the Concerned engineer.
2.) The titled Rain Water Harvesting/ Recharging detail drawing has been uploaded in the relevant tab.
Kindly consider the same for approval.
|
10/24/2024 |
PENDING WITH NODAL OFFICER |
|
| 4 |
Jitendra Tripathi (10665) |
1. Still the sign and seal of Respective/Concerned engineer is pasted/scanned copy, get the physically sign and seal of Respective/Concerned engineer on Service drawings;
2. Facility plots belongs to competent authority so, common services of scheme can not be design in facility area'
3. what is legend for "FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION" & "FOR SUBMISSION"; clarify;
Comply with the same by on or before 04.11.2024. |
10/26/2024 |
APPLICATION OBJECTED |
|
| 5 |
Promoter |
Dear Sir,
As per the observation raised in the online application by you,
1.) The scanned copy of services drawings are uploaded duly signed and sealed by the Concerned engineer.
2.) The common services have been designed within the area specifically designated for such services in the facility plot which is also marked in the maps at the time of approval of the project by the competent authority.
3. The revised drawings are uploaded.
Kindly consider the same for approval. |
2/17/2025 |
PENDING WITH NODAL OFFICER |
|
| 6 |
Jitendra Tripathi (10665) |
The project was registered under the plotted development category, but according to the services drawings, it appears that identical villa types have been developed on all plots; Clarify on or before 25.02.2025 |
2/19/2025 |
APPLICATION OBJECTED |
|
| 7 |
Promoter |
Dear Sir
Yes, The project is registered under the plotted development category and it is suitable for development of residential farm house only on plots allotted, however the marking aligns for the development adheres to the Maximum permissible limit as outlined by the JDA's norms and guidelines relating to the development on the residential farm house plotted project. Therefore, Allottee(s) of the said plots shall have the right to develop but as per permissible limit of the prevailing laws.
Regards. |
2/20/2025 |
PENDING WITH NODAL OFFICER |
|
| 8 |
Jitendra Tripathi (10665) |
The project was registered under the plotted development category, but according to the services drawings, it appears that identical farm house types have been developed on all plots; all farm house developed by promoter or individual allottee, Clarify on or before 05.03.2025
|
2/25/2025 |
APPLICATION OBJECTED |
|
| 9 |
Promoter |
Dear Sir
As per observation raised by you in the application, It is hereby clarified that the only individual allottees are developing their allotted farmhouse.
Kindly Consider this for approval |
2/25/2025 |
PENDING WITH NODAL OFFICER |
|
| 10 |
Jitendra Tripathi (10665) |
1. Promoter has applied for updation of services drawings as per RERA regulations. The project was registered under the plotted development category, but according to the services drawings, it appears that identical farm house types have been developed on all plots;
2. For the same promoter replied at para 9/N, that "the only individual allottees are developing their allotted farmhouse."
Therefore application is submitted for kind perusal and decision on updating services drawings of the project. |
2/25/2025 |
PENDING WITH JOINT REGISTRAR |
|
| 11 |
R.S. Kulhari (9009) |
Record Pulled by REGISTRAR |
2/28/2025 |
PENDING WITH REGISTRAR |
|
| 12 |
R.S. Kulhari (9009) |
As per report of Nodal officer identical Farm House have been developed on all plots whereas the scheme was approved under plotted category. Therefore, to clear the ambiguity a site inspection may be conducted by the officers of project cell, if approved, Madam. |
3/17/2025 |
PENDING WITH CHAIRMAN |
|
| 13 |
Chairman Rajasthan (1) |
site inspection may be conducted. |
3/17/2025 |
PENDING WITH REGISTRAR |
|
| 14 |
R.S. Kulhari (9009) |
Comply with the directions of Hon'ble Chairperson. |
3/24/2025 |
PENDING WITH NODAL OFFICER |
|
| 15 |
Jitendra Tripathi (10665) |
A site visit was conducted on 02.04.2025. The scheme consists of 27 farmhouse plots, of which 12 remain vacant while 15 are either constructed or under construction. Four farmhouses feature different elevations and planning, while 11 farmhouses maintain similar elevations and planning. The promoter's representative clarified that all constructed or under-construction farmhouses are being built by their respective buyers/owners. The promoter has merely attempted to standardize the design by recommending the same pattern, color scheme, and facade elevation to maintain uniformity throughout the development. Photographs have been attached for reference.
Therefore application is submitted for kind perusal and decision on updating services drawings of the project.
|
4/24/2025 |
PENDING WITH JOINT REGISTRAR |
|
| 16 |
R.S. Kulhari (9009) |
Record Pulled by REGISTRAR |
4/25/2025 |
PENDING WITH REGISTRAR |
|
| 17 |
R.S. Kulhari (9009) |
May kindly peruse the report of the site inspection whereby it can not be inferred that the promoter it self is developing the Villas. Therefore, submitted for approval of service drawings, Madam. |
5/8/2025 |
PENDING WITH CHAIRMAN |
|
| 18 |
Chairman Rajasthan (1) |
approved |
5/8/2025 |
APPLICATION APPROVED |
|
